Thursday, November 14, 2024
42.0°F

FWP looking at trapping restrictions to protect lynx

by Hungry Horse News
| May 17, 2015 9:41 AM
Lynx can be drawn to traps set for other animals.

]]>
A plan to restrict trapping near Glacier and Yellowstone national parks to protect lynx was presented to the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission on May 14.

State  wildlife officials are considering stricter regulations in an effort to reduce the chances of Canada lynx being caught in traps set for other animals outside the national parks.

The plan is part of a settlement agreement for a lawsuit filed in 2013 by three environmental groups over trapping in the threatened species’ habitat.

The environmental groups say in their lawsuit that the department violated the federal Endangered Species Act by allowing trapping in lynx habitat. Fifteen lynx captures have been reported to the state agency since 2000, according to the groups’ attorney, Matthew Bishop. The terms of the settlement are a compromise that took more than six months to reach an agreement, he said.

Several of the settlement’s statewide restrictions are already in place, but additional changes are needed in special zones near Yellowstone and in a larger area outside Glacier, FWP attorney Aimee Fausser said.

The changes include restrictions on the types of traps and snares that can be used in the special protection zones. Trappers would only be allowed to use meat for bait if it is more than 24 hours old, and they would be barred from using rabbit or hare parts that could lure lynx. Bobcat trappers must check their traps at least every 48 hours, under the proposal.

The Montana Trappers Association opposes the settlement agreement. Toby Walrath, the group’s president, said the lawsuit’s aim is to do away with trapping altogether.

“The lynx issue is just one more thing these groups are using to try to eliminate trapping,” he said. “It impacts the trapper far more than it improves things for the lynx.”

Walrath said he hopes to convince the Fish and Wildlife Commission to approve different regulations.

The commission is taking public comment before making a final decision on the proposal. If it approves the changes, the parties in the lawsuit will ask a federal judge to dismiss the case.

]]>

A plan to restrict trapping near Glacier and Yellowstone national parks to protect lynx was presented to the Montana Fish and Wildlife Commission on May 14.

State  wildlife officials are considering stricter regulations in an effort to reduce the chances of Canada lynx being caught in traps set for other animals outside the national parks.

The plan is part of a settlement agreement for a lawsuit filed in 2013 by three environmental groups over trapping in the threatened species’ habitat.

The environmental groups say in their lawsuit that the department violated the federal Endangered Species Act by allowing trapping in lynx habitat. Fifteen lynx captures have been reported to the state agency since 2000, according to the groups’ attorney, Matthew Bishop. The terms of the settlement are a compromise that took more than six months to reach an agreement, he said.

Several of the settlement’s statewide restrictions are already in place, but additional changes are needed in special zones near Yellowstone and in a larger area outside Glacier, FWP attorney Aimee Fausser said.

The changes include restrictions on the types of traps and snares that can be used in the special protection zones. Trappers would only be allowed to use meat for bait if it is more than 24 hours old, and they would be barred from using rabbit or hare parts that could lure lynx. Bobcat trappers must check their traps at least every 48 hours, under the proposal.

The Montana Trappers Association opposes the settlement agreement. Toby Walrath, the group’s president, said the lawsuit’s aim is to do away with trapping altogether.

“The lynx issue is just one more thing these groups are using to try to eliminate trapping,” he said. “It impacts the trapper far more than it improves things for the lynx.”

Walrath said he hopes to convince the Fish and Wildlife Commission to approve different regulations.

The commission is taking public comment before making a final decision on the proposal. If it approves the changes, the parties in the lawsuit will ask a federal judge to dismiss the case.